JonZu Groups

Hi, CME not need CUBE license, CME can do outside sip trunk.

Here is the example.

Voice service voip

address-hiding

allow-connections h323 to h323

allow-connections h323 to sip

allow-connections sip to h323

allow-connections sip to sip

supplementary-service h450.12

h323

sip

bind control source-interface Loopback0

bind media source-interface Loopback0

registrar server expires max 3600 min 3600

!

voice class codec 1

codec preference 1 g729r8

!

interface Loopback0

ip address xx.xx.xx.xx 255.255.255.252 /real ip

!

dial-peer voice 90 voip

corlist outgoing call-international

preference 1

destination-pattern 00T

voice-class codec 1

session protocol sipv2

session target ipv4:62.244.205.100

dtmf-relay rtp-nte

clid network-number 0232xxxxxxx

!

Best regards, Baris.

Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 1:08 PM

Hello, can somebody help me with a (example) config for a CME CUBE setup?

Many thanks!

regards, Marty

Hello, can somebody help me with a (example) config for a CME CUBE setup?

Many thanks!

regards, Marty

Hi all,

The top left of Firefox is too focused on. If Mozilla leaves all the features there it makes it too easy for the user. I propose Mozilla takes really commonly used features of Firefox like bookmarks (which Mozilla’s own studies have shown is the most clicked on feature in Firefox) and turn them in to an ambiguous button and move them to a random corner of Firefox. This helps:

* Massively increase user eye strain * Confuse users so that us more techy people can smugly point to where common features are * Increase needed mouse movement which over time may accelerate wrist problems and reduces accuracy of button clicking due to Fitt’s law * Blazingly ignore all studies Mozilla has commissioned on cognitive processes * Reduce discoverability by putting brand new features as tiny icons in the status bar, which is really a bar with questionable value

To help confuse and disorientate users further I suggest Mozilla start putting in features with UI which lacks any sort continuity or integration with current Firefox UI. Perhaps some random shortcut like alt + * or ctrl + space. Make sure the new UI completely baffles the user by making it take up the whole screen with no obvious way to escape, when they weren’t sure how they got there in the 1st place. Make sure it has complex meta-conceptual features which arbitrarily don’t fit in to any previous way of organising any UI. Make sure once users interact with it it starts hiding parts of Firefox from the user unless they become an expert at it.

Also just to make it harder for users, introduce a new menu system that makes very common actions like bookmarks and history into sub menus so users have to click through even further than normal. To top it off make the region in which they have to click through very small, using an obscure take on a common UI feature with no immediate visual indication that this feature is different to normal. Then present the feature under the guise that it makes navigation simpler with less click through, even while ignoring your own studies which show that bookmarks is hugely clicked on.

Finally, please make Firefox UI less customisable from basic mouse click kind of operations. Make it hard to find a space where you can Right Click > Customize…. Make adding any old default toolbars look disorientingly unintegrated. Don’t let users move objects about, just give them static choice options and call it “progress”.

Please take my suggestions seriously and think about all the kind of benefits these have on the user.

It’s great Thanks Jarek Cheers RobertQ

On Sep 10, 2:39 am, Jarek Wilkiewicz wrote:

On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Gary Duncanson wrote:

He’s active on CLN.

-Thomas

Hi,

I’m looking for some way to generate a tone that resembles the sound of an instrument. I need precise control of the base frequency (pitch). I’m wondering what would be the best way to generate it on an iPhone. Store a file with a know frequency and resample it to the desired frequency? Synthesize a tone by calculating a bunch of sines? Doing some FFT trick on a file? If someone can give some insight into what would best fit the H/W available it would be grateful.

Kind regards,

Remco Poelstra

Hi Chris,

As far as I remember, MAC access-lists are only used to filter non-IP traffic like ARP. In your example, when you shut the interface, routers will clear their ARP tables. And when you enable it again and try to create traffic, the MAC access list will block all new ARP requests. So you thought that your ACL worked after a shut/no-shut. But, actually it only blocked the ARP packets. To test it, after shut and no-shut, create manual ARP entries on routers. They probably start to communicate again and you will see that your MAC filter is not working for IP traffic.

Another way of testing can be clearing ARP tables on routers without a shut/no shut operation. Since MAC ACL will again block the ARP request, your ACL will again seem to be working (but just because it blocked arps).

Please share your result to see if I am right.

Thanks.

All text on google.com and a bunch of other sites is BOLD when its not supposed to be. If I load a new profile in FFX4b5 it has the same issue, but on 3 it goes away…. Tried reinstalling fonts and changing all the default fonts… nothing works…. help please this is driving me crazy.

If this was a bank with billions of dollars potentially risk would you trust putting your DMZ VLAN on a Nexus VDC vs Physical Isolation? I guess half of this is about best practice regardless of make/model/manufacturer.

Christopher Copley [mailto:copley.chris@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 9:33 PM Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com Re: Using Nexus 7k ports for ASA DMZ Vlan ports?

How about using a different VDC for the DMZ?

Chris On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Jason Aarons (US) <jason.aarons@us.didata.com> wrote: A customer want’s to put a Layer2 DMZ vlan on his Nexus 7k, and is wondering if Private VLAN/VDCs will keep that vlan from his inside network. Basically he needs some switchports for his DMZ and doesn’t want to put them on a 3750. From a security perspective I would never advise this to mitigate risk by using Physical Isolation, but I’m not clear if the Nexus Private VLAN/VDC would mitigate the risk. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VLAN_hopping

Hello,

we’re planning to start moving towards using the new embed mechanism described in this blog post:

http://apiblog.youtube.com/2010/07/new-way-to-embed-youtube-videos.html

soon. As a part of the process, the oEmbed response will use the by default and so will the YouTube.com site. Please rest assured that the existing mechanism will continue to work as we roll out the new embed, but it will likely be deprecated at some point in the future. Additionally, currently there is still functionality not yet implemented by the embed, such as API support, and we will share updates as this functionality comes online. Please let us know if you encounter any issues with the new mechanism. You may have noticed that the YouTube watch page button now gives an option of the new iframe embed code (“Use iframe embed code (beta)”) which is helpful to quickly test the new embed for any video. We hope that the new mechanism will simplify the process of embedding videos and make it more robust as well as portable across a wide range of browsers and devices.

Thanks, Jarek Wilkiewicz, YouTube API Team

~ YouTube is hiring! ~ http://google.com/jobs/workyoutube ~